About
This issue brief examines how South Korea can structure public financing to support coal phase-out and achieve its climate targets under existing fiscal constraints. Focusing on the role of sovereign green bonds, it assesses Korea’s current financing landscape, including institutional limitations, funding gaps, and governance challenges.
Drawing on Germany’s experience as a debt-constrained country, the brief highlights how a combination of carbon pricing revenues, special-purpose funds, and sovereign green bonds can mobilize large-scale transition finance while maintaining fiscal credibility. The analysis emphasizes the importance of clear institutional design, transparency, and the separation of coal exit costs from forward-looking investment.
By identifying transferable design principles rather than replicable models, the brief provides practical insights into how Korea can strengthen its financing architecture to scale clean energy investment, support coal-dependent regions, and translate climate commitments into implementation.
Download report
Executive summary
Achieving South Korea’s climate targets, including carbon neutrality by 2050 and strengthened Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), requires a rapid and large-scale shift away from coal. This transition is not only technologically complex but also financially demanding, particularly in a context of a fiscal conservative government and sensitivity to public debt expansion.
While Korea has established initial financing mechanisms, such as the Climate Response Fund and the Korean Emissions Trading System (K-ETS), current funding levels and institutional structures remain insufficient to meet the scale of required investment. At the same time, discussions on sovereign green bonds are gaining momentum as a potential tool to mobilize additional capital.
This issue brief examines how Korea can structure coal-to-clean financing more effectively by drawing lessons from Germany. Despite operating under strict fiscal constraints, such as the countrey's constitutional debt brake, Germany has developed a financing model that mobilizes substantial transition investment for a clean energy transition without permanently expanding structural deficits.
At the core of this approach is a clearly defined financing architecture combining:
Carbon pricing revenues as a predictable funding source
Legally separated special-purpose funds for multi-year transition investment
Sovereign green bonds used primarily as refinancing instruments, combined with strong transparency mechanisms

A key feature of this model is the institutional separation between coal exit costs and forward-looking investment, as well as the framing of transition spending as temporary, purpose-bound, and investment-oriented. This structure enhances fiscal credibility, supports political acceptance, and aligns public spending with the polluter-pays principle.
Key findings
Based on this analysis, the brief identifies several recommendations for Korea to successfully achieve its NDC targets and advance coal phase-out, including strengthening carbon pricing as a stable revenue source, establishing clearly separated transition financing structures, and scaling sovereign green bonds as refinancing instruments for climate-aligned investment, alongside targeted regional support and limited, well-defined temporary borrowing.
Taken together, these measures do not require permanent debt expansion. Instead, they highlight the importance of restructuring financing architecture to mobilize and channel capital more effectively. Germany’s experience demonstrates that even under tight fiscal constraints, well-designed public finance systems can enable a credible, large-scale transition from coal to clean energy.





