Speed Bumps on the Renewable Energy Highway: Minimum Generation Levels of Thermal Power Plants
research 2025-08-05
Gas Energy Markets & Policy Issue Brief Coal Renewable Energy

Speed Bumps on the Renewable Energy Highway: Minimum Generation Levels of Thermal Power Plants

About

This issue brief reveals that the high minimum generation levels* guaranteed to existing generators such as coal and gas plants act as a barrier to renewable energy integration. It examines the validity of the current minimum generation standards, and, through domestic and international cases of downward adjustment, demonstrates that revising these levels is practically feasible and can serve as a key instrument for accelerating the energy transition.

*Minimum Generation Level is defined as “the minimum output level that an individual generator must maintain in order to comply with environmental regulations while ensuring stable operation.”

Executive summary


Despite Korea’s 2050 carbon neutrality pledge, the country still relies on fossil fuels for roughly 60% of its power generation, while the transition to renewables has lagged. Accelerating this transition requires strong policy support, yet recent measures—such as the 2024 restriction on new renewable energy grid connections for roughly one-third of the country's substations—have instead restricted renewable deployment. These actions cannot be regarded as unavoidable from a system operation standpoint, particularly in light of global energy transition trends.

This issue brief highlights the reduction of thermal power plants’ minimum generation levels as a key task for expanding renewable energy. Minimum generation levels refer to the guaranteed minimum output of generators, justified by claims of safety and environmental compliance, and typically applied to large-scale coal, gas, and nuclear facilities. In Korea, excessively high minimum generation levels—averaging 50–60% of capacity—are guaranteed, inevitably constraining renewable output (see table).

Under current grid operation rules, the combined minimum generation levels of must-run generators are guaranteed first, and renewables are permitted only within the remaining demand range. Once projected renewable generation exceeds this threshold, curtailment begins (Detailed Rules on Grid Evaluation and Operation Article 8.3.1). Conversely, lowering must-run generators’ minimum generation levels would reduce curtailment and enhance system stability (see figure).

International practice demonstrates that safer and more flexible operation is possible. Global guidelines recommend 20–40% as a technically sound minimum generation range, and major countries have already reformed accordingly. Japan lowered thermal plant minimum generation from 50% to 30% in 2024; India reduced from 70% to 55% in 2023 with a roadmap to reach 40%; and China, through retrofits and compensation schemes, cut levels from 60–70% to 30–40%, significantly reducing curtailment.

Korea has made limited progress. In August 2024, Jeju’s grid introduced the concept of an “output floor below minimum generation,” enabling must-run generators to operate below their conventional thresholds. However, such reforms have yet to be applied on the mainland grid, where curtailment is worsening and new renewable projects face connection bans. Mainland reforms must be expedited to enhance flexibility of existing plants and unlock fuller use of the existing grid infrastructure. The starting point is minimum generation level adjustment.

Key findings

For an effective energy transition, two measures are essential:

  1. Lowering thermal plant minimum generation levels: Establish a uniform cap of at least 40% in line with international standards, while creating effective compensation mechanisms—such as reforms to the capacity payment system—to incentivize generators to propose even lower thresholds.

  2. Ensuring transparency and oversight: Improve procedures for calculating and verifying minimum generation levels, and establish institutional mechanisms for public disclosure of plant-level data. Robust monitoring by the system operator is critical to prevent excessive levels that hinder grid efficiency, especially in the absence of strong voluntary incentives.

Support SFOC
in creating winning climate movements!

Donate
  • Policy Research and Recommendations

    Policy Research and Recommendations

    We conduct in-depth analysis of climate, energy, industrial, and economic policies to propose viable policy alternatives and help bring about real policy change.

  • Legal Action and Litigation

    Legal Action and Litigation

    We hold corporations and governments accountable when they delay climate action, utilizing a range of legal strategies, including litigation, to drive policy improvement.

  • Communications and Campaigns

    Communications and Campaigns

    We believe that the power to change the world lies with people. Through compelling messages and diverse communication channels, we raise public awareness about the climate crisis and inspire collective action.

  • International Cooperation

    International Cooperation

    We understand that climate change knows no borders. Through networking and collaboration, we work with global environmental organizations to promote change at the international level.

Solutions for Our Climate

CEO

Joojin Kim

Registration No.

561-82-00137

Address

505 5th Fl., HEYGROUND, 5 Ttuksseom-ro 1na-gil, Sungdong-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (04779)


TEL

02-6013-0137