About
This report examines the untransparent grid use fee system in South Korea, a system which has deㅅerred many companies from signing Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with renewable energy generators. Grid use fees, an unavoidable cost required for using the electricity grid, can add significant costs to total price of a PPA; and with the secrecy surrounding how grid fee rates are set, companies can not predict the long-term costs of ther 20-year PPA. This is a significant risk for companies, particularly in the context of previous acts of discriminatory pricing for PPA users by the state-owned utility Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO).
By contrasting South Korea's grid use regulatory system to those of two international cases - Ofgem and NESO in Great Britain, and FERC and PJM in the United States - this report reveals critical structures and policies necessary to ensure a transparent, fair, and sustainable grid use fee regulatory system - a system that encourages more PPAs and grid investments to support renewable energy expansion.
Download report
Executive summary
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) for renewable energy are an essential tool to secure investment to build new generation and advance the energy transition. However, in South Korea PPAs are impeded by a system of rigid regulations and a blackbox of opaque power grid fee rate setting standards set by the fossil-fuel oriented utility Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO). Companies in South Korea that want to support the expansion of renewable energy through PPAs have stated that this opaque grid fee setting system needs to be addressed to revitalize the PPA adoption. Combined with the lack of competition in the power sector, this highlights the importance of having transparent grid fee setting systems, as power grid fees are a significant factor in a PPAs long-term price.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and PJM Interconnection (PJM) in the United States, and the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) and the National Energy System Operator (NESO) in Great Britain, are two regulatory systems well known for their transparent and pragmatic grid fee setting procedures. Ofgem also goes a step further in incorporating actions for net-zero as factors in their approval process, stimulating investments for a renewable-friendly and sustainable power grid. These systems offer effective examples to improve South Korea’s grid fee setting systems to be more accountable, transparent, and sustainable.

Key findings
Introduce an independent regulatory body that oversees power grid planning and rate approval
Publish calculating methodologies for grid use fee rates, including disclosure of all costs which make up the rate base of power grid use tariffs and how the rate base is used to calculate the rates
Include requirements for planning and investments in grid enhancements for net-zero in the grid fee approval process
Allow open access to regulatory committee meetings and allow public feedback




